These positions are perceived as a contradiction idRegel and move so long the mind.
make some of this question even their understanding of God, and specify in any thoughts of "evolution" an attack on the true faith. This then becomes the basis of a "religious war" sparked by the the matter and the sometimes very unpleasant and absurd forms, even within Christianity, has developed. It will then be discussed occasionally do so "important" questions whether Adam now had a belly button or not ...
But the Bible is actually finding incompatible with the predictions of the theory of evolution and various scientific findings?
make some of this question even their understanding of God, and specify in any thoughts of "evolution" an attack on the true faith. This then becomes the basis of a "religious war" sparked by the the matter and the sometimes very unpleasant and absurd forms, even within Christianity, has developed. It will then be discussed occasionally do so "important" questions whether Adam now had a belly button or not ...
But the Bible is actually finding incompatible with the predictions of the theory of evolution and various scientific findings?
I suspect that quite a stir a lot of confusion and misunderstanding, therefore, that often prevails an understanding of God that the "God" of our childhood, scientific as an old man with white beard, has not really overcome, and that this view of the. embossed side is simply assumed or assumed.
to facebook, I had a little video link, which gave rise to a lively exchange with now almost 100 comments. The video of this style, there are infinitely many There is, admittedly very simple and very one-sided illuminated only a single point in relation to the fossil record. The issue, however, is much more complex.
Evolution says nothing in itself other than "development". develop
that the plants that animals and humans and adapt the external environment was, for me, never questioned and it can be seen in the development of the current "gay Digitalus" even within his own lifetime - but remains as nunmal a man always a man - no matter how much he "degenerate."
Until now at least for me no question that there is no possibility that a species evolves into a different genre and I think this idea for completely absurd. Moreover, that that is exactly the point at which the "evolution theory" is sick, as far as I know, there is no evidence for the supposed transitional forms.
Darwin said to myself, if that evidence is given, then his theory was wrong.
On the one hand the theme of the Origin of the world and of the people, though quite significant, and almost every move these issues more or less, it is based but not central religious theme, or even healing crucial - on the other hand, the often emotional debate shows again how large deficits on all sides - and this applies especially well to the understanding of the biblical account of creation.
Robert has several on his blog interesting Fonts link, which is me page particularly noticed that I would like to recommend here, although I first grade your review on the so-called Kurzzeitkreationismus read there and have it read there are a lot more on the topic.
I would like the issue here also pick up on the blog and (hopefully not emotionally) you ask - I think it's good to get outside the box an idea of the great events of creation, that the frontiers of thinking may well explode.
For thus says the Lord, who created the heavens, he is God, who formed the earth and has made, he prepares them, not as a waste he created it, to be inhabited, he formed it:
I am the Lord, and there is none!
(Isaiah 45:18) ***
to facebook, I had a little video link, which gave rise to a lively exchange with now almost 100 comments. The video of this style, there are infinitely many There is, admittedly very simple and very one-sided illuminated only a single point in relation to the fossil record. The issue, however, is much more complex.
Evolution says nothing in itself other than "development". develop
that the plants that animals and humans and adapt the external environment was, for me, never questioned and it can be seen in the development of the current "gay Digitalus" even within his own lifetime - but remains as nunmal a man always a man - no matter how much he "degenerate."
Until now at least for me no question that there is no possibility that a species evolves into a different genre and I think this idea for completely absurd. Moreover, that that is exactly the point at which the "evolution theory" is sick, as far as I know, there is no evidence for the supposed transitional forms.
Darwin said to myself, if that evidence is given, then his theory was wrong.
On the one hand the theme of the Origin of the world and of the people, though quite significant, and almost every move these issues more or less, it is based but not central religious theme, or even healing crucial - on the other hand, the often emotional debate shows again how large deficits on all sides - and this applies especially well to the understanding of the biblical account of creation.
Robert has several on his blog interesting Fonts link, which is me page particularly noticed that I would like to recommend here, although I first grade your review on the so-called Kurzzeitkreationismus read there and have it read there are a lot more on the topic.
I would like the issue here also pick up on the blog and (hopefully not emotionally) you ask - I think it's good to get outside the box an idea of the great events of creation, that the frontiers of thinking may well explode.
For thus says the Lord, who created the heavens, he is God, who formed the earth and has made, he prepares them, not as a waste he created it, to be inhabited, he formed it:
I am the Lord, and there is none!
(Isaiah 45:18) ***
0 comments:
Post a Comment