to facebook , the "woman question" - exceeded contribution now 60 comments, unfortunately, was the follow-up far so much attention, but I think it is time to point out the real cause of this "question".
In Creation account in 1.Mose 1 we read that man was created as man and wife. They should work together to preserve the rule of creation. Only in the second chapter we learn the details.
We learn among other things, that was "the man" formed out of earth and God breathed life. The tasks and bids fare but not to either the man or woman, but "the people".
After the first describes how the body "of the people" a second man was created, then the special unit of men and women demonstrates that they are not given as two independent system in place.
In Creation account in 1.Mose 1 we read that man was created as man and wife. They should work together to preserve the rule of creation. Only in the second chapter we learn the details.
We learn among other things, that was "the man" formed out of earth and God breathed life. The tasks and bids fare but not to either the man or woman, but "the people".
And the Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat: but of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat, for in the Day that you eat of it you shall surely die.
(1.Mo 2:15-17) After the first describes how the body "of the people" a second man was created, then the special unit of men and women demonstrates that they are not given as two independent system in place.
So here is indeed a sequence recognizable, but no order of priority, as it is interpreted into so much into the questions about man and woman. Also in the fact that the woman is the opposite and the help of the man who can be a "hierarchy" interprate only very limited, because the same inevitable and indeed the man is the counterpart is and the help of women, as seen in spite of all tasks in the notes to the letters of the NT's good.
However, neither the woman without the man nor the man without the woman in the Lord.
(1.Kor.11: 11)
My concern is here to clarify that the fact that man exists now as a man and woman, not the God-given unity of the two divided apart, but they were created to life to overcome together. Here's order does, however, a role, but not interpreted into a hierarchy.
is always happy to point out that Eva is seduced
Where's Adam: yet - let?
is either he on now, not because he is "more important" has to do to cultivate such as the garden, or walk with God through the area - or he stands with open eyes and just did not prevent - both would be a gross violation of his responsibility!
Therefore God also has to pull out "the people" to account, and asks him "where are you? - (Not where you are!)
falls as an excuse for Adam now that it was indeed the woman who gave him food and he also does not shy away from being even a hidden accusation against God himself to bring into it:
And man said, The woman whom thou hast given me, she gave me of the tree, and I ate.
(1Mo 3:12)
This maneuver is probably the most common cause of a failed marriage!
It's just the unit is dissolved mentally and verbally, and pushed the blame on the opposite. Man (n) no longer feels "responsible" for what the other does. Said Adam says here "the woman" and isolated them so already verbally from the unit, they are really together before God.
Such an attitude is always a hidden accusation against God himself ...
***
Mandy said I should not write such long posts forever - so here is a two-parter ...
However, neither the woman without the man nor the man without the woman in the Lord.
(1.Kor.11: 11)
My concern is here to clarify that the fact that man exists now as a man and woman, not the God-given unity of the two divided apart, but they were created to life to overcome together. Here's order does, however, a role, but not interpreted into a hierarchy.
is always happy to point out that Eva is seduced
Where's Adam: yet - let?
is either he on now, not because he is "more important" has to do to cultivate such as the garden, or walk with God through the area - or he stands with open eyes and just did not prevent - both would be a gross violation of his responsibility!
Therefore God also has to pull out "the people" to account, and asks him "where are you? - (Not where you are!)
falls as an excuse for Adam now that it was indeed the woman who gave him food and he also does not shy away from being even a hidden accusation against God himself to bring into it:
And man said, The woman whom thou hast given me, she gave me of the tree, and I ate.
(1Mo 3:12)
This maneuver is probably the most common cause of a failed marriage!
It's just the unit is dissolved mentally and verbally, and pushed the blame on the opposite. Man (n) no longer feels "responsible" for what the other does. Said Adam says here "the woman" and isolated them so already verbally from the unit, they are really together before God.
Such an attitude is always a hidden accusation against God himself ...
***
Mandy said I should not write such long posts forever - so here is a two-parter ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment