I admit it: So every one, two days I have seen purely as a guest at dol2day . Because of course remains, after three years of membership in such a community even more interesting how it goes on (perhaps with a spark of vanity, "as it goes on without me." * G *).
I call on the current polls, survey, look into one or the other discussion, check out and even discuss the open forum of my former party ... and always knows less about what has kept me there so long.
Well, on the one hand, has about all the time, of course, developed a social relationship to the other Dolern. And some co-Doler I personally know in the real world and appreciate.
On the other hand, I really felt for some time that reluctance. The reluctance, which was created by the daily trifles, you got to read.
In any discussion appeared flattest "arguments" on - there was general rate polemic on stupid way that the images could be jealous.
But not only that - eventually builds up the whole thing Dol on unique foundations. Dol should not only be just talk but policy-simulation platform.
But what such a policy simulation? How to simulate policy?
Who is in sound at all with this issue understands, including the self-management of this virtual world. So as the creation of internal rules and optical, organizational design options. The first
sounds logical - which would be concrete policies other than the content and the self-organized development of Community Structures?
There are unfortunately only a few concrete problems is
First, the possibility of a limited virtual world to govern (ver), very limited. Will not you scare people on participation, one can not create jungle landscapes of rules just for the purpose of simulating motion. The rule simplification, one might come up at some point as a solution is bound to be limited.
Forage for "political" dispute, which is defined so, that is limited.
is another, even more serious problem that this rule does not simulate in the virtual world Dol-fits with what the normal Humans think of as politics.
a politically interested person is moved from the real issues: issues of economic policy, educational issues, external events and processes, or simply more fundamental ideological beliefs and theories. Just after
answers to these subject areas to define the most and the most representative Dol-parties: There are right-wing, leftist, liberal parties, there are parties that align themselves with real examples and try to parties, the political currents to mix again. Actually a very interesting thing to say, the policy interested.
And what he finds it? Political competition in which he participates with his party colleagues and its stated objective of the chancellor is, may turn to the matters in question, quite reliable indeed is the view have responded to political controversy, the children or PAGE readers may:
As the evil (the leftists, the rightists, the Greens, liberals), here the good guys. And, happy Aufeinanderein-beating!
But then? What beckons to the winner of this dispute, the bearing and the keywords?
A profile picture on the front page, entitled, "Government" forum to design and administer. What else?
Otherwise it will remain, the well-chosen chancellor, has two options: to try
The internal control design. So as to compete against Christian Democrat, Socialist, as a Green against liberals, Communists as against the extreme right and to argue with these opponents to Dol-game rules. Therefore, when polls ask who should who should be punished for that crime against the culture of debate how and which virtual points are what gives.
albeit a political dispute over non-political rules usually in the passive nowhere.
Because votes are decided on the rules then, who is proposing this rule change.
because we are so taken up as a right against the left (and vice versa) in the election of the chancellor. And why should now change the level of meaning, forget real political differences and focus instead argue about virtual community rules? Then yes, the boundary between the followers of this or that rule-idea across "government" and "opposition" and led the basics of the election took place ad absurdum.
The other possibility of a chancellor, is his real political conviction through statements at home and abroad to represent. This he can do. While there are some extremists of the status quo, who want to restrict the Chancellor in the described role as an apolitical absurd rule proposal instance, but the majority seems to be a politically occurring Registrar not particularly objectionable to find.
Here was a concept that my colleagues and I model of "two levels" called.
goal was to separate the internal control plane from the real-political level. So to give itself the real-defining political parties in the contest for the chancellorship also such content.
While the rule simulators separately in groups together and together choose could reasonably be expected to enjoy the non-political rule-making pleasures without it, "left" and "right" to define or defend properly far in this camp mixture to have.
The image we had in mind was a chancellor, who is perceived by the outside Dols-advertises. While he is freed from the internal, non-political organization and usually cares only about the politics, the men of Dol attracts and the basis of the dollar parties. In which he as at least a few thousand people elected Chancellor on various topics as publicity statement refers. As natural as possible on issues which could be attributed to members of a political web-platform expertise.
The "two levels" concept is, as I have recently seen, failed in a vote.
meantime I am also of the opinion that it had to fail.
The majority of the Dole has set up the status quo. The majority uses Dol as a discussion forum, the parties used as a meeting place of like-minded and has the choice of a chancellor for a fairly trivial matter in which one won the best political candidates are close to his voice. Whatever.
Self-awareness and interest for the experiment is missing, interact with an elected Chancellor of the real policy.
Registrar and with him organized, on a goal-oriented political competition has been laid ad acta. Even if the form still preserves and acts as if it was bad when the political opponent has the dubious pleasure to ask the Registrar.
As I no longer represent Dol. And when are no additional project, I think it failed.
I will go soon have to erase the dollar account "Boche" and remove the link from my blog. Because I can really recommend dol2day not.
I call on the current polls, survey, look into one or the other discussion, check out and even discuss the open forum of my former party ... and always knows less about what has kept me there so long.
Well, on the one hand, has about all the time, of course, developed a social relationship to the other Dolern. And some co-Doler I personally know in the real world and appreciate.
On the other hand, I really felt for some time that reluctance. The reluctance, which was created by the daily trifles, you got to read.
In any discussion appeared flattest "arguments" on - there was general rate polemic on stupid way that the images could be jealous.
But not only that - eventually builds up the whole thing Dol on unique foundations. Dol should not only be just talk but policy-simulation platform.
But what such a policy simulation? How to simulate policy?
Who is in sound at all with this issue understands, including the self-management of this virtual world. So as the creation of internal rules and optical, organizational design options. The first
sounds logical - which would be concrete policies other than the content and the self-organized development of Community Structures?
There are unfortunately only a few concrete problems is
First, the possibility of a limited virtual world to govern (ver), very limited. Will not you scare people on participation, one can not create jungle landscapes of rules just for the purpose of simulating motion. The rule simplification, one might come up at some point as a solution is bound to be limited.
Forage for "political" dispute, which is defined so, that is limited.
is another, even more serious problem that this rule does not simulate in the virtual world Dol-fits with what the normal Humans think of as politics.
a politically interested person is moved from the real issues: issues of economic policy, educational issues, external events and processes, or simply more fundamental ideological beliefs and theories. Just after
answers to these subject areas to define the most and the most representative Dol-parties: There are right-wing, leftist, liberal parties, there are parties that align themselves with real examples and try to parties, the political currents to mix again. Actually a very interesting thing to say, the policy interested.
And what he finds it? Political competition in which he participates with his party colleagues and its stated objective of the chancellor is, may turn to the matters in question, quite reliable indeed is the view have responded to political controversy, the children or PAGE readers may:
As the evil (the leftists, the rightists, the Greens, liberals), here the good guys. And, happy Aufeinanderein-beating!
But then? What beckons to the winner of this dispute, the bearing and the keywords?
A profile picture on the front page, entitled, "Government" forum to design and administer. What else?
Otherwise it will remain, the well-chosen chancellor, has two options: to try
The internal control design. So as to compete against Christian Democrat, Socialist, as a Green against liberals, Communists as against the extreme right and to argue with these opponents to Dol-game rules. Therefore, when polls ask who should who should be punished for that crime against the culture of debate how and which virtual points are what gives.
albeit a political dispute over non-political rules usually in the passive nowhere.
Because votes are decided on the rules then, who is proposing this rule change.
because we are so taken up as a right against the left (and vice versa) in the election of the chancellor. And why should now change the level of meaning, forget real political differences and focus instead argue about virtual community rules? Then yes, the boundary between the followers of this or that rule-idea across "government" and "opposition" and led the basics of the election took place ad absurdum.
The other possibility of a chancellor, is his real political conviction through statements at home and abroad to represent. This he can do. While there are some extremists of the status quo, who want to restrict the Chancellor in the described role as an apolitical absurd rule proposal instance, but the majority seems to be a politically occurring Registrar not particularly objectionable to find.
Here was a concept that my colleagues and I model of "two levels" called.
goal was to separate the internal control plane from the real-political level. So to give itself the real-defining political parties in the contest for the chancellorship also such content.
While the rule simulators separately in groups together and together choose could reasonably be expected to enjoy the non-political rule-making pleasures without it, "left" and "right" to define or defend properly far in this camp mixture to have.
The image we had in mind was a chancellor, who is perceived by the outside Dols-advertises. While he is freed from the internal, non-political organization and usually cares only about the politics, the men of Dol attracts and the basis of the dollar parties. In which he as at least a few thousand people elected Chancellor on various topics as publicity statement refers. As natural as possible on issues which could be attributed to members of a political web-platform expertise.
The "two levels" concept is, as I have recently seen, failed in a vote.
meantime I am also of the opinion that it had to fail.
The majority of the Dole has set up the status quo. The majority uses Dol as a discussion forum, the parties used as a meeting place of like-minded and has the choice of a chancellor for a fairly trivial matter in which one won the best political candidates are close to his voice. Whatever.
Self-awareness and interest for the experiment is missing, interact with an elected Chancellor of the real policy.
Registrar and with him organized, on a goal-oriented political competition has been laid ad acta. Even if the form still preserves and acts as if it was bad when the political opponent has the dubious pleasure to ask the Registrar.
As I no longer represent Dol. And when are no additional project, I think it failed.
I will go soon have to erase the dollar account "Boche" and remove the link from my blog. Because I can really recommend dol2day not.
0 comments:
Post a Comment