Ring Worm In Black Peopple

The "men question - where is Adam? (Part 2)

We have seen in the first part how "cleverly" dumps Adam the responsibility (and blame) for his wife. The

seems, at first glance to be working, for now get the woman reprimanded them again accused the serpent, and so gets the first as well as their fat - well, then it is still thick. Eva has a lot of suffering in pregnancy and birth the descendants of Adam and the announcement begins:

"Because you listened to the voice of thy wife ..."
(1.Mos.3: 17)
- Ooops.

Here's not to say that men should not always listen when women say something (many men seem to be designed so * lol *) but there is simply no excuse when it comes to a word and the will of God!

Interestingly, concerns the part of the disobedience of the woman "only" they themselves - the sufferings of pregnancy and childbirth and
now also a ranking!

To the woman he said, I will increase the very Toil of your pregnancy, with pain you shall bring forth children, and to thy husband is thy desire, he will rule over you.
(1.Mos.3: 16)

We can therefore safely say, that began with the disobedience against God's word, the hierarchy between men and women.
The consequences for the man, however, affected the whole of creation: it follows a life in pain and the irrevocable expulsion from the paradise - Oops!

.. ohh sorry - I had "irrevocably" said?
was no, there's a significant event that was to restore everything and the people return to God's presence would -

JESUS HAS DONE IT!

Now we must go back through Jesus to the tree of (eternal) life!

There will be no hierarchy anymore, but there are quite a following order:

But I want you to know that Christ is the head of every man, head of the wife but the man, the Christ head but God .
(1 Cor 11:3)

This will meisst read hierarchical, because we can hardly have imagined differently, but it goes to the core total gift of love - they can not "demanded" be (although it is called for again and again). What it means to us, Jesus in His submission to "His head" - shown, you should do it like him, so that through the body of the main JESUS is visible in the world - the father.

is also very clear that a "principal" is not simply redirects of rule will, but seeks the best for others and acting out of love - and love never seeks its own advantage.

".. but we were gentle among you, as a nurturing woman cares for her own children."
(1 Thess. 2:7)

In order to these special requirements in a local congregation of the community justice to be, should be entrusted to line (up) administration only to those elders who were first proved by such transferred on line in their marriage and family. This shows how closely the task of leading within marriage and family and the community are linked.

-----

And now comes the million dollar question for those who want to take the main prize of the Gospel in the contemporary world:

What is the role of the man?

A) Always ensure that his wife submits to him so that he can take over the leadership of the community

B) His wife's line left in the family, so that it can continue its success for the management of the community.

subordinate C) completely Jesus, so that the order God in marriage, family and the community can be restored.

D) It is up to each himself, as he saw fit, depending on the knowledge of good and evil in this issue for the right thing.


The Joker There are already all gone - so you must find out the answer myself ..!
;-))

You can also, with half of the gospel going home to you again to devote more important tasks - the sky is yes then be the fullness ...

"God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble." Sun humble yourselves under the mighty hand of God now, to that which will in time increase .
(1.Pet.5: 5b +6)

***

Baby Cologne By Mennen

The "men question - where is Adam? (Part 1)

to facebook , the "woman question" - exceeded contribution now 60 comments, unfortunately, was the follow-up far so much attention, but I think it is time to point out the real cause of this "question".

In Creation account in 1.Mose 1 we read that man was created as man and wife. They should work together to preserve the rule of creation. Only in the second chapter we learn the details.
We learn among other things, that was "the man" formed out of earth and God breathed life. The tasks and bids fare but not to either the man or woman, but "the people".

And the Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat: but of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat, for in the Day that you eat of it you shall surely die.

(1.Mo 2:15-17)

After the first describes how the body "of the people" a second man was created, then the special unit of men and women demonstrates that they are not given as two independent system in place.

So here is indeed a sequence recognizable, but no order of priority, as it is interpreted into so much into the questions about man and woman. Also in the fact that the woman is the opposite and the help of the man who can be a "hierarchy" interprate only very limited, because the same inevitable and indeed the man is the counterpart is and the help of women, as seen in spite of all tasks in the notes to the letters of the NT's good.

However, neither the woman without the man nor the man without the woman in the Lord.
(1.Kor.11: 11)

My concern is here to clarify that the fact that man exists now as a man and woman, not the God-given unity of the two divided apart, but they were created to life to overcome together. Here's order does, however, a role, but not interpreted into a hierarchy.

is always happy to point out that Eva is seduced

Where's Adam: yet - let?

is either he on now, not because he is "more important" has to do to cultivate such as the garden, or walk with God through the area - or he stands with open eyes and just did not prevent - both would be a gross violation of his responsibility!

Therefore God also has to pull out "the people" to account, and asks him "where are you? - (Not where you are!)
falls as an excuse for Adam now that it was indeed the woman who gave him food and he also does not shy away from being even a hidden accusation against God himself to bring into it:

And man said, The woman whom thou hast given me, she gave me of the tree, and I ate.
(1Mo 3:12)

This maneuver is probably the most common cause of a failed marriage!

It's just the unit is dissolved mentally and verbally, and pushed the blame on the opposite. Man (n) no longer feels "responsible" for what the other does. Said Adam says here "the woman" and isolated them so already verbally from the unit, they are really together before God.

Such an attitude is always a hidden accusation against God himself ...

***

Mandy said I should not write such long posts forever - so here is a two-parter ...

North Face Without Logo On Back

women - any questions?

with the last post I've picked the yes again into the toilet and I probably stripped the last remaining sympathies of the audience.

who now assumes that this behavior is with me slowly become a morbid tendency to give is probably the real meaning of the word sympathy not aware of: It is made up of "syn" = together, and "path" = disease and referred therefore a collective medical condition! - Oops ...

seems very far-fetched, the first, is also biblically quite understandable, because who is trying to please people, can hardly find favor with God:

For I am now looking to make people happy, or God? Or do I seek to please men? If I were still pleasing men, I would not be a servant of Christ.
(Gal 1:10)

this sense, the urge to be nice to do well what is pathological in itself, because for us it bekanntl. to love - and that has nothing in common with sympathy!

On my way to spiritual health, I have therefore already lost a number of companions, some say quite openly that they with me or my views, comments and Comments not want to be confronted, or where the exchange is asleep quietly but unmistakably - but even this blog will probably gelegentl. as dangerous and has disappeared from various link lists.

I would not say that I would be completely indifferent, but it is nunmal reality, and the gain in knowledge, freedom and devotion seems to me in perfect correlation vermeintl to them. to "losses" to be.

am of course still a long way and I against this "sympathy" virus "immune, as I discovered to my sustainable horrified by the visit of a friend, which I reported in the second to last post had ...

-

was a dear sister is now in the course of discussions about the previous proposal that I should even post a "positive list" write what women as "may" now everything. I would love to take up here!

But before that a little resumé of recent "Woman Question":
Rarely has become so clear to me how difficult it is to consider a spiritual question without emotional turmoil. The undertone of the vermeintl. "Injustice" and the "oppression of women" is not easy to solve from this discussion. It will appear as quickly as justice would be something that we somehow make ourselves need and as it were in succession and in the body of Jesus is not in any case and, in principle to surrender and submission to the real goal:

The glory of God and the salvation of men!




look like this, when men and women match and blend perfectly in this objective, I have seen only this impressive in our meeting by the testimony of a wonderful sister.

It was a very young age (17) filled with the Holy Spirit and praying in languages already, long before they knew what is it anyway - because of her family and community was something like not spoken. She has experienced impressive signs and wonders, and people got to know personally, read the favorite playing of which we only books - such as John Wimber.

One of their sons was freed miraculously from severe drug addiction and later studied theology. She survived a major accident, has seen how lame and the sick by laying on her hand (and without) were healthy and she has all states with a typical English humor that came with some tears - and laughter!

HALLELUJAH HALLELUJAH - praised be the Lord forever, our wonderful God!

Well, the (estimated) age of well over 60 (her husband is older than them), they follow the call, here in Portugal a "house of life" for children and other people in need to build ... wooooooaaaahhh.

was particularly poignant here, accompanied her husband on keyboards and a brother with singing the whole thing by looking for each section of their testimony, the verse of a suitable well-rehearsed songs of praise -
goosebumps - YEAH!

stood as tangible as this wonderful truth before our eyes:

The woman is man's glory.
(1.Ko.11: 7b)

Amen!


Ok - the times were now completely "untheological" some Examples of what "may" Women certainly do so all while we men have to worry about with boring theory and annoying church leadership ... well then come on, ladies! :-)))

***

btw - that was everything today, "the way" done, as we celebrate our monthly and for each open breakfast - I get no more me how wonderful it in a "very normal community "is! :-)

Renal Cortical Cysts Bilateral

The "woman question" is resolved!

... for me anyway! ;-)

Always a contentious topic of whether women can now take over the management of a municipality or not, whether they must teach and what they had in general "may".

As far as I'm concerned, there are two main lines of argument:

One more secular: relies upon it, that to assume recognizable from the publication ban on women, the management and the teaching of a community, a culturally-time-stamped matter was and as we live now in modern times, where no one more "discrimination" will have no meaning and therefore something we are now "free" has become unacceptable by this "oppression" of women ...

The weakness of such a design-time clergy is probably pretty obvious, and basically it involves the actual Discrimination:
you denigrate the very important tasks and the special responsibility of women in family and community.

The religious garb in the next argument is to see through even harder:
This is referred to the "talent" and the "fruit", which often mitlerweile teaching and senior women had indeed nunmal.
This argument seems at first to be "irrefutable," yet one apple remains nunmal always a divine gift, is full of vitamins and tastes delicious even when it has unlawfully appropriated.

So one can not determine easily from the fruit of her this question and legitimacy.

It is villt. not entirely irrelevant to note that Paul refers to the corresponding statement is not only fundamental to God's created order, but also includes a significant historical event with, in which women played a crucial role ...

I suffer not a woman that they teach, nor that it was about the man, but she was still. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman has can lead you to transgression.
(1.Tim.2 :12-14)

(my mentor told so unequivocal Written statements are: "So you need help to misunderstand it "...)

would yet further supporting the interpretation of scripture. Obviously there can now get different results depending on which view "evidence" you want. So I think it is advisable that here as elsewhere, is always looking to JESUS itself. This is the case in the controversial "question of baptism" as well as in the assessment and effectiveness of the Holy Spirit and is unfortunately all too often overlooked in theological wrangling.

why if you please, Jesus himself for no woman (s) to the "line" called by a apostleship? On the "Teaching of the Apostles" was indeed the community and we are still! (Hopefully)
not exactly a very effective Had been an affront to the religious system froze its time to the "true spirit and will of God" to reveal in this case and to decide, once and for all? Or someone really wants
say, Jesus would not have just done out of respect for the cultural traditions and the Zeitgeit?

Jesus teaches not just in words but in power - and everything he did is a powerful model for our thinking and doing

Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers their in the heavenly calling, look at the apostle and high priest whom we confess Jesus, who is faithful to that which made him ...
(Heb.3: 1 +2 a)

Ok people - for me it is hereby eaten the cheese, the issue off the table and the "woman question" been settled!

***

really moves me about this grade does not own, because in our community, there are brilliant to any questions or disputes - but it was the moment for example
HERE and HERE taken up and discussed in various articles .